Indexed XPLABlockchain Data

XPLA has produced blocks since 2022 as a sovereign Cosmos SDK chain, built by the Korean game publisher Com2uS as the settlement layer for its own titles and the studios around them. Validators run CometBFT under proof of stake, XPLA is the native token, and accounts are bech32 strings with an xpla prefix. Two execution environments sit on that one ledger: CosmWasm, where contracts are WebAssembly modules, and an EVM built on go-ethereum, where the same Solidity a developer would deploy to Ethereum runs unchanged. Because that EVM uses Ethereum’s key format, one account has two written forms, a bech32 string and a twenty-byte hex address, and IBC keeps the chain connected to the Cosmos Hub. The community has since voted to rename the token and the brand to CONX, which changed the name without changing the ledger.

SonarX indexes both halves of the chain: blocks and transactions with their typed messages, CosmWasm instantiate and execute calls, EVM transactions with their receipts and decoded logs, IBC transfers, staking records, and derived balances across all of it. Everything is normalized into the model SonarX uses on every network it covers, so a wasm transfer and an ERC-20 transfer read the same way.

Full historical coverage is available today as a data-share or a file delivery. Real-time delivery is enabled on request. Balance tables and the balance APIs can be enabled for XPLA on request.

A token here can be three things, and a holder total is wrong unless all three are counted: a native bank denomination held as protocol state, a CW20 balance inside a wasm contract, and an ERC-20 balance inside EVM storage. Each has its own transfer semantics and its own way of reporting a change, so one asset can move through all three representations in a day. Identity compounds it: the same keys produce a bech32 address and a hex address, both appear in the history, and attribution has to canonicalize the pair before any balance is summed.

In-game economy analysis is the first workload: how much of a title’s currency is minted, spent and withdrawn, measured per period rather than per session, which is the only view that shows whether an economy is closed. Holder and item analysis is the second, and it is where the three token systems have to be reconciled into one holder set. Treasury and issuance reporting is the third, since a publisher operating several titles needs one statement across them. Token analytics covers issuance work of this kind across chains, and teams comparing company-run networks usually pull Chiliz into the same warehouse.

Tell us the delivery target, how far back you need and how fresh it has to be, and the share is scoped against that. XPLA history is available now as a share or a file delivery, and streaming is provisioned on request. Say which contracts matter, because scoping by contract usually beats taking the chain whole. The published coverage matrix for every network SonarX indexes lives in the data documentation, and the rest of the catalogue is at all indexed chains.