Indexed Terra LunaBlockchain Data
Terra Luna is the Cosmos SDK chain a governance vote created in May 2022 after the older network's algorithmic dollar failed, launched from its own genesis with the market module deliberately left out.
How to query Terra Luna data with SonarX
Instant Data Share
Available todaySnowflake, and file dumps to your object storage
Query Terra Luna blockchain data with plain SQL from a live database inside your own Snowflake account, populated with the indexed chain dataset. There is no pipeline to build and no second copy to store. The same dataset ships as file dumps to your own object storage for lakes and warehouses that are not Snowflake.
- Full history as a Snowflake data-share
- File dumps to S3 or your own object storage
- Real-time delivery, current to chain tip — on request
Used for:
- Analytics teams already on Snowflake that want Terra Luna data beside their existing tables
- Fund accounting and treasury reporting that reconciles against a fixed history
- Cross-chain questions answered in one SQL statement instead of one query per chain
- Loading Terra Luna history into BigQuery, Databricks, Redshift or a Spark lake
- Replacing a self-hosted indexer and the engineering time that keeps it running
- Serving one governed dataset to several desks without copying it per team
Realtime API
Enabled on requestREST over the indexed dataset
Query indexed Terra Luna records over REST, reading the same dataset the share reads, with no warehouse in the path.
Used for:
- Applications that need one answer rather than a table scan
- Customer-facing screens where query latency is visible to a user
- Services that have no data warehouse and do not want to run one
- Prototyping against production data before committing to a share
- Backend checks that run per request instead of per batch
- Teams that want indexed Terra Luna data behind their own API layer
Terra Luna data: frequently asked questions
What is Terra Luna?
Terra Luna is the chain a Terra governance vote created in May 2022, after the algorithmic dollar on the older network failed. It launched from its own genesis under the chain identifier phoenix-1, with balances distributed at launch rather than carried over as blocks, so this ledger holds nothing from before that date. Validators run CometBFT under proof of stake, so a committed block is final and there is no reorg to unwind. LUNA is the native token, counted in uluna, and accounts are bech32 strings with a terra prefix. Contracts are CosmWasm and the module set is the ordinary Cosmos SDK one: the market module that minted and burned against a stablecoin on the older chain was left out on purpose. IBC connects it to the Cosmos Hub. Terraform Labs, which built both chains, began winding down in 2024, so the network runs on its validators and its governance.
Terra Luna data on SonarX
SonarX indexes what the chain records: blocks and transactions with their typed messages, CosmWasm instantiate and execute calls, staking, delegation and reward records, governance proposals and votes, IBC transfers with the denominations they carry, and derived account balances. Everything is normalized into the model SonarX uses across every network it covers, so this chain and its predecessor are queried in one language.
Full historical coverage is available today as a data-share or a file delivery. Real-time delivery is enabled on request.
How SonarX indexes Terra Luna
A fresh genesis with allocated balances is the thing that catches pipelines out. Opening balances here have no incoming transfer to explain them, so a balance history has to be seeded from the genesis allocation and only then advanced by transfers, or every early holder looks like it received money from nowhere. The denomination is the second trap: uluna is the unit on this chain and on the older one, so a query keyed on the denomination alone silently merges two ledgers, and the chain identifier has to travel with every row.
What teams build with Terra Luna data
Holder and distribution analysis is the first workload, and this chain is an unusually clean case, because the launch allocation is on record and everything after it is a traceable movement. Reward accounting is the second, derived per period and per validator from module state. Comparative research is the third and the reason many teams hold both datasets, since what survived here and what stayed on the older chain is a question about two ledgers at once. DeFi analytics covers position-level work across chains, and Terra Luna Classic is the other half of any long series.
Getting Terra Luna data from SonarX
Tell us the delivery target, how far back you need and how fresh it has to be, and the share is scoped against that. Terra Luna coverage is provisioned on request, so tell us the history depth and the delivery target and we will scope it. Say whether the older chain is in scope, because that decides whether one share or two are needed. The published coverage matrix for every network SonarX indexes lives in the data documentation, and the rest of the catalogue is at all indexed chains.
Is there a Terra Luna data API?
APIs over indexed Terra Luna data are enabled on request: the same indexed dataset the Snowflake share reads, served over REST once provisioned. Tell us the lookup pattern you need.
How do I get Terra Luna data into Snowflake?
SonarX provisions a data-share into your own Snowflake account. The share appears as a database you query with SQL, so there is no pipeline to build and no second copy to store, and it stays current as SonarX advances the indexing pipeline.
How far back does Terra Luna coverage go?
To this chain's own genesis in May 2022, and it is provisioned on request as a data-share or file delivery. Nothing earlier belongs to it: the activity before that date happened on Terra Luna Classic, which SonarX indexes as a separate dataset, so a question spanning both eras is a join across two shares rather than one long series.
How is Terra Luna different from Terra Luna Classic?
They are two chains, not two names for one. Classic ran from 2019 and is where the collapse of the algorithmic dollar happened in May 2022. Terra Luna is the chain a governance vote created that month, starting from a fresh genesis with balances distributed at launch, keeping the LUNA ticker and leaving the stablecoin design behind. Neither chain contains the other's blocks.
Does Terra Luna still have an algorithmic stablecoin?
No. The mint-and-burn mechanism that swapped LUNA against a dollar token was deliberately left out of the new chain, and the tokens involved stayed on the older ledger under the names LUNC and USTC. What runs here is an ordinary Cosmos SDK chain with CosmWasm contracts, so any dollar exposure comes from assets issued or bridged in rather than minted by the protocol.